Saturday, April 19, 2008

Personal Rules of Engagement


There was an exercise in April's Utah Polite Society event that simulated an assault that takes place at a restaurant. As with most of the simulations we run, the number and position of threats were changed for each participant, and it was up to the participant to determine who to shoot first (if anyone), and when to start shooting (if at all).



One of the folks new to our events raised the question, "how do you know when to start shooting and how do you know who you should shoot?" He wanted to know how he was supposed to figure this out in real time as a defensive encounter unfolds. The individual running the exercise started to explain this, and then called me over to talk about my personal take on the subject.



At first I thought, "Oh great, how am I going to explain this in a way that will make sense to him?" As I started to try to explain this to the fellow who asked the question and the rest of the folks queued up to run the exercise, it occurred to me that all I had to do was explain how my personal rules of engagement worked and how they could develop a set of their own.



As I started to explain this, the other folks participating in the event stopped shooting their exercises and came over to join the discussion. Pretty soon, I found myself talking to a large group of individuals who all wanted to know how this should work. As this was of such interest at the event, I thought it might be worthwhile to post an article here that covers the high points of the discussion.



What are personal rules of engagement? In a nutshell, your personal rules of engagement are a set of guidelines you develop that will help you decide when you should use deadly force, and who you are willing to use deadly force to defend.



Why do you need a set of personal rules of engagement, and why should you prepare them in advance of having to use them? The situations in which you may have to use a firearm to defend you and yours can develop very quickly. You just won't have the time or clarity of focus to sort out the legal, moral, and personal issues in real time. You will be taxed to the limit to just formulate and execute the tactics needed to survive the situation. Everything else - the moral, legal, and ethical stuff - needs to be sorted out beforehand.



Everybody's different. Each of us has a different set of moral, financial, and personal priorities, as well as different physical abilities and limitations. Some folks may place a higher, or lower, priority on protecting others. Some may be better, or less, able to bear the cost of legal representation. Some may, or may not, have small children they need to protect. Some may be young with the fast reflexes and agility of youth. Others may be older and slower, or have their mobility limited by physical disability. Each of us has a different set of considerations to weigh when developing the personal guidelines we'll use in determining when and how to use deadly force. One size definitely does not fit all. One person's rules of engagement will always be different than the next person's. This is because each of us has a different set of circumstances that need to be considered when our personal rules are developed.



With that out of the way, let's get down to what a set of rules of engagement actually are. Someone once told me that I'm a gearbox kind of guy. I tend to break things down into their constituent parts and then figure out how all the individual pieces mesh. That's the approach I took when I figured out my personal rules of engagement, and that's how I'll present their development here.



So, what components do you need to take into consideration when developing your personal rules of engagement? The first thing I considered when I developed my rules was, "who am I willing to defend with deadly force?" For me, this is a very short list, so I started referring to it as my short list. The next thing I considered was, "what kinds of events are serious enough to force my use of deadly force?" Since these are things that would trigger my use of deadly force, I decided to call them triggering events. In thinking about triggering events and how I should respond to them, three distinct categories of actions came to mind. The first are pre-triggering event actions. These are actions you can take when you see a situation start to develop that can put you and yours in a better tactical situation to deal with a threat. The second are the actions you should take when a triggering event happens. And the third are post-triggering event actions. These are actions you should take after you've had to use deadly force.



Before we get into actually developing your personal rules form these building blocks, let's talk about deadly force for a bit. What we're talking about here is taking someone's life. This is not something that should be taken lightly. The use of deadly force will not only bring someone else's life to a very permanent end, it will likely bring profound consequences to your own life as well. Even if you do everything right, you'll likely end up in court defending yourself against a civil suit, and may even find yourself defending against criminal charges. In a best-case scenario, this could cost you several tens of thousands of dollars and the stress you'll have to live through will likely take a heavy toll. If it's not a best-case scenario, it could cost you your home, your marriage, and even your freedom. If you do not prevail in the defensive encounter it may cost you your life and, as we've seen in many of the simulations we've run, there is no guarantee you will prevail. You also run a real chance of accidentally shooting an innocent bystander. This has happed more than infrequently in the simulations we've run. Using your firearm for defense equals employing deadly force. Employing deadly force means potentially taking someone's life and, irrevocably, changing the rest of your own in some very dire ways.



OK, now that we've set the context for all of this, lets talk about the steps involved in putting together your personal rules of engagement.



Develop your short list. Your short list is the list of folks who you are willing to defend with deadly force. When you develop this list, you should ask yourself if you are willing to suffer the consequences of using deadly force for each and every name you include on this list. Is the person associated with each name on your list important enough to you that you are willing to take someone else's life in their defense, and live with the consequences of that action for the rest of your life? If there are individuals on your list who's safety is not very, very important to you, you may want to reconsider if you are willing to irrevocably change your life by coming to their defense.



I wasn't sure whether or not to include this next point in this article, as it always generates some heated debate whenever I bring it up in discussions of this topic. I decided to include it with the following proviso. If you disagree with my opinion, keep in mind that it's just a personal opinion and you are more than free to develop a differing opinion. Remember, one size doesn't fit all.



So here's the controversial point. Each and every adult in our society who is eligible to hold a concealed-carry permit and carry a gun for self-defense, has made a conscious decision about their personal defense. I've chosen to have the means and skills to defend myself, if need arises. Most folks in our society have chosen to not carry a gun for their own defense. So, if they have chosen to not use deadly force in their own defense and find themselves in dire straights, should it be incumbent on me to defend them? My personal opinion is, in the vast majority of cases, it is not. If they are not willing to defend themselves, why should it be incumbent on me to irrevocably change my own life by using deadly force in their defense? You may, or may not, want to consider this when you develop your own short list.



OK, so what's next after you've developed your short list? You need to decide what actions - triggering events - rise to a threat level that will require you to use deadly force. I can probably best address this by using an example that I've often used when discussing this topic.



Here's the setup. You, and some of the folks on your short list, are in the local neighborhood Seven-Eleven store when you see an individual pull a gun on the clerk and demand money. You and yours are out of the robber's immediate view, and may be able to take cover or escape without being noticed. What do you do?



The first question to ask is, "is the clerk on your short list?" Are you willing to use deadly force to defend the clerk? In my case, let's say I'm in the store with my grand kids and their mom to get a slurpee. Is my first priority to protect my family or to protect the clerk? My family members are on my short list, but the clerk isn't. For me this is pretty straightforward. Someone pointing a gun at the clerk isn't yet a triggering event. I'm going to focus on the things I can do to protect my family.



As things have developed so far, one of my personal triggering events hasn't happened yet. Doe's this mean I do nothing? It doesn't mean that at all! Remember the pre-triggering-event actions I mentioned earlier? This is when they come into play. I'm going to get my family members out of harm's way as best I can. This may mean doing something like getting them to an exit or to cover without being noticed by the robber. But I need their cooperation to do this effectively.



This brings up another issue that should be considered in the development of your rules of engagement. You need to include the folks on your short list as active participants in your plans. You need with talk to them about potential threat situations and the actions you would like them to take when these situations arise. More on this later.



OK, let's say I've gotten my family members to cover, but we haven't been able to exit the store. Let's also say the robber starts to turn around and says, "Everybody get in the back room!" For me this is a triggering event, because there's no way it's going to end well. It's time for my triggering-event actions to come in to play.



In this case, I want two actions to happen simultaneously. I want to shoot the bad guy before he shoots me, and I want my daughter-in-law to get the grand kids away from grandpa. Why do I want her to do that? Because grandpa just turned into a bullet magnet, and I don't want the kids to collect any stray rounds that may have been meant for me. Do I have time to tell her to get the kids away? No, she needs to know that and do it instinctively. She needs to be part of the plan.



At this point let's say I was successful in shooting the bad guy before he shot me. What do I do now? I make sure he's no longer a threat, and that he doesn't have any friends near at hand before I do anything else. I make sure I'm ready to address any additional threats that may turn up if he does have friends close by. Then I make sure I'm OK and my family members are OK. Once this has been done, I make sure all the witnesses and evidence stay put and are available when the police get there. I call the police, and then I call my lawyer. You do have your lawyer's number in your wallet, don't you? There are a few other things I may do after the triggering event, but we won't get into those here.



When we were discussing this at the April Utah Polite Society Event, the issue of exceptions came up. Should you allow for exceptions to your personal rules of engagement? One of the fellows commented on how the Trolley Square shooting had made him revisit his own set of rules. As his rules stood before the Trolley Square shooting hit the news, he would have gotten out of harm's way unless personally confronted by the shooter. After considering all the people who had been killed, he decided he wouldn't, in good conscience, be able to let this happen. So, he made a mental exception to his rules of engagement. In this case he would have gone after the shooter. Exceptions to the rule aren't necessarily a bad thing.



The Seven-Eleven scenario we've use here is just one of many possible scenarios that could take place. When you see news stories like home invasions, mall shootings, car jackings and the like, use these as aids in developing your personal rules of engagement. Identify the triggering events, the pre-triggering-event actions, the triggering-event actions, and the post-triggering-event actions you would have to consider if you found yourself in these situations. Incorporate these into your personal rules of engagement. You should be constantly revising your rules as you take more possible defensive situations into consideration.



OK now that we're this far in developing a set of personal rules of engagement, there are a few more things that need to be mentioned before wrapping this up.



Your rules of engagement should be a set of personal guidelines, not hard and fast rules. You need to allow yourself the latitude to adapt to unexpected situations, because you'll not be able to anticipate every eventuality in any set of preconceived rules.



Once you've developed your initial set of personal rules, you should adjust your practice, training, and personal carry gear to work with them. When you consider your personal gear, you may want to evaluate things like how you carry, how much ammo you carry, or if you need to incorporate other options like a home-defense carbine into training regimen. You should continually test your personal rules, and the other components of your self-defense regimen that go along with them. Make sure they work together. This is precisely why we run simulations at our monthly Utah Polite Society events, and why we include carbines, shotguns, and other options in our simulations. When you shoot these simulations with us, use them to test your rules of engagement, and everything else that goes along with them.



One last thing, once you've developed your personal rules and lived with them for a while, you may want to reevaluate whether or not you are actually willing use deadly force in the situations you've considered and if you are willing to deal with the consequences this may bring. This is not a choice that should be taken lightly; it deserves serious thought and consideration.



So, in general terms, here are the steps involved with developing your personal rules of engagement.



  • Put together a short list of the folks you are willing to defend.


  • Identify the things that will be triggering events for you, personally.


  • Figure out what pre-triggering-event, triggering-event, and post-triggering-event actions you need to plan for.


  • Include the folks on your short list in your planning.


  • Realize that you need to leave room for exceptions to your rules of engagement.


  • Use your personal rules as guidelines that leave you the latitude to adapt to unexpected situations.


  • Adjust your practice, training, and equipment to work in concert with your rules of engagement.


  • Reevaluate your willingness to use deadly force in light of the considerations your rules have made you take into account.


  • Realize that your rules of engagement are tailored to you and may not be appropriate for others.


  • If you take the time to develop these rules of engagement in advance, it'll be that much less you'll have to process in the few seconds you'll have when crunch time comes. It may just allow you to concentrate on dealing with the threat well enough to survive a life or death encounter.

    Wednesday, April 2, 2008

    April Utah Polite Society Event

    There’s a Utah Polite Society event at Hendricksen Range Saturday, April 5.

    We plan to have five courses of fire at the April event, all using defensive sidearms.

    The first exercise at this month’s event is a simulated defensive encounter that has you respond to an attacking dog running straight at you.

    The second exercise is skills drill that practices getting off the X and away from the threat while engaging the threat with live fire.

    The third exercise is a repeat of exercise one, but incorporates the movement concepts practiced in exercise two.

    The fourth exercise is a skills drill that practices drawing and engaging threats from various directions while seated.

    The fifth exercise is a simulated defensive encounter that has you use the skills practiced in exercise four in responding to an attack in a restaurant.

    Please bring your handgun (and related equipment) at least 70 rounds of pistol ammo
    (bring extra, if you would like to shoot additional handgun exercises or shoot steel after
    the exercises).
    Set up starts at 8:00 a.m.
    New shooter orientation starts at 8:30 a.m.
    Registration starts at 8:45 a.m.
    Shooting exercises starts at 9:00 a.m.
    Event fee is $12.00.  

    Gunsite Class & Carbine Serries

    In May, our regular event will be superseded by the three-day, Gunsite pistol class the Utah Polite Society is sponsoring. The class is full, but Gunsite has started a waiting list for those who would like to fly standby.

    In June, we plan to start a series of carbine exercises that will run through the summer months. These will start with the basics and then build on them over the succeeding months. The carbine exercises will be done in addition to our regular pistol exercises.

    Here’s what we have planned for the carbine series in June:

    Safety: Establishing a working zero (the shooting part of the day); the pros and cons of zeroing at various ranges with the caliber of one’s choice; problems created by a high line of sight over bore line ; manual of arms for AR, AK, and M1. The intent is to help someone, even if they are starting from scratch, to get their rifle up and running.

    Here’s what we’re planning for July:

    Marksmanship: Basic skill drills (the shooting part of the day). The other subjects I would like to cover here are support systems: slings, mags, mag carry system, sights, and maintenance. On day 2, a person can use the sights that came on the rifle, a simple web, no sling, and load from a back pocket. However, from here on, one needs to start building a support system.

    In the succeeding months:

    Future subjects: Transition to pistol, low-light, the effects of cover on various calibers, operation of a carbine with one hand only, and whatever else the group would like to cover.

    Keep in mind the carbine exercises aren’t exclusively for those with “black rifles.” If you have a Ruger 10-22, a lever-action 30-30, or even a bolt-action rifle that you would like to learn how to use defensively, bring it to the event in June.

    Monday, March 3, 2008

    March Event Report

    This month's Utah Polite Society event could be called "Shoot your friends gun day." When I wrote up the report of our October event, when we gave everyone a chance to familiarize themselves with AK and AR rifles, I talked about familiarity with the world's most common rifles as part of a basic "firearms literacy" that every shooter should have. This month's event extended that concept to pistols. There aren't really any pistols that are quite as dominant as the AK and AR are in the rifle category, but I figure that someone who can operate Glocks, 1911s, the Beretta M92/M9, and S&W revolvers will certainly have the majority of service and self defense pistols covered.

    Handgun Familiarization
    To kick things off, we asked anyone who was willing to let other folks shoot their pistol to lay it on the table for others to use. I definitely didn't want anybody to feel they had to let others shoot their pistol, but it turned out that almost everyone was willing to let their fellow shooters put a few rounds through their gun. I ended up having to turn some folks away, since I figured we didn't need a bunch of different Glocks or 1911s on the table.

    To the best of my recollection (I'm doing this from memory) we had the following pistols available:
    Glock 21
    Glock 31
    S&W 686
    M&P .40
    P3AT
    Makarov
    USP .45 Fullsize
    USP .45 Compact
    XD .45 Compact
    Colt 1911 Government
    SIG P228
    Star Firestar
    Beretta 96

    We asked each person to demonstrate the basic operation of their pistol (how the safety works, where the magazine release is, etc.) to the group. After all the pistols were explained, we put four targets out and let fly. Anyone could pick one of the pistols, load some ammo, and start shooting.

    I fired most of the guns on the table, most of which were types I'd never shot before.

    • P3AT: This is a little tiny gun. Not only was I unable to get my pinky finger on the grip, my ring finger was slipping off when I fired it. The .380 isn't a very powerful round, but between the P3AT's light weight and tiny grip, it was hard to keep a good hold of it during recoil.
    • Makarov: Same round as the P3AT, but in a more reasonably sized package.
    • Glock 31: A lot of people seemed to like this one. I've always heard the .357 SIG was a loud round, and it was definitely louder than anything else we were shooting. It's got very different recoil characteristics than the .45s I'm used to shooting. Not necessarily more recoil, but a lot more 'snappy'.
    • S&W M&P .40: Shoots very much like a Glock, but points a bit differently. This one had the small backstrap on it, which didn't feel big enough in my hand. I'd definitely like to try one with the large backstrap sometime.
    • USP .45 Fullsize: I used a USP .45 Compact as my daily carry gun for a while, so the fullsize USP felt pretty familiar. I definitely like the bigger grip of the fullsize better than the compact though.
    • SIG P228: The long, heavy double action trigger pull on the SIG really screwed me up. I don't normally have a flinching problem, but I'm so used to the much shorter, lighter trigger pull of the Glock that I was visibly flinching with the DA pull on the SIG. The single action shooting was much better, with a nice crisp trigger action.
    • Beretta 96: Much like the SIG, I had some real problems with the DA pull on the Beretta.
    • S&W Revolver: Unlike the DA semiautos, I didn't really have any problem shooting the revolver double-action. The pull was lighter and a lot smoother than the semis. I really liked shooting this one.
    • Colt 1911 Government: I've shot 1911s before and as usual, this one was very accurate with an excellent trigger. However, the slide on this particular pistol occasionally didn't want to go all the way back into battery. There were a plethora of 1911s available, so we switched to another one for the scenario.

    Everyone really seemed to have a blast shooting all the guns. I had to call and end to it and pull them away to make sure we'd have enough time for the scenarios.

    Meeting Madness
    It was a bit difficult coming up with scenarios where you would plausibly be shooting with someone else's pistol. These two may be a bit more of a stretch than some of the things we usually do, but I think they're at least somewhat plausible. Like an episode of Law and Order, the first scenario was "ripped from the headlines". You are attending a city council meeting. Since the city hall is a "gun free zone" and had a metal detector at the door, you left your gun in the car. Unfortunately, the metal detector prooves insufficient to deter some nutcases with a grudge against the city council and they come in shooting. A police officer sitting next to you is among the first to be hit and you have to use his weapon. You start sitting in a chair with the pistol next to you. There are a pair of barricades representing the doors to the council meeting room 3-4 yards behind you and several targets (some of which have threat indicators on them) scattered both inside and outside the room. At the start signal you have to retrieve the weapon and solve the problem.

    For this scenario, we rotated through a Glock 21, a 1911, and a Beretta 96 (all plausible police duty weapons). I made sure to give each shooter an unfamiliar weapon (1911 guys got the Glock or the Beretta, etc.)

    The biggest issue people had in this scenario was getting the gun into action. Some of this was just the nature of the chosen weapons, botht the 1911 and the Beretta have safeties which may have to be disengaged before firing. However, this was also somewhat deliberate. In addition to giving shooters a gun they weren't familiar with, I tried to vary the starting condition of the gun while still being realistic. For instance, I gave the first three shooters a Beretta with the safety engaged, a 1911 with the safety engaged, and a Glock with an empty chamber. Every one of them tried to fire the gun and couldn't. It took each of these shooters 5-10 seconds to figure out what they needed to do to get the gun into action. I even managed to mess up the next shooter by giving him a Beretta with the safety off (the preferred carry method: ready to fire with the DA trigger pull). After seeing the first three shooters try and fail to shoot the pistol, this shooter spent a couple of seconds exmining the gun, despite the fact that it was in ready to fire condition (you know you're doing a good job messing with people when you can get them to mess with themselves by doing nothing).

    Once people got the gun into action, things went pretty smoothly. Safeties and decockers aside, gunhandling skills seem to transfer from one pistol to another pretty smoothly. We did have a fair number of no-shoot targets get hit through the barricades, though. You are responsible for everything your bullet does downrange. Be aware of your target and what is beyond it. Remember, sheetrock doesn't stop bullets!

    About half the time I set up a target with both a threat indicator and a cardboard sheriff's star handing on it. As usual, we had several people hit the cop (some on a shoot through and some deliberately). It's important to think about what you're seeing and what you're doing.

    Another hiccup that popped up was figuring what to do with the extra magazine. I left an extra mag lying on the chair with the pistol (two extra mags for the 1911). Some folks left the magazine sitting on the chair, which is not necessarily a bad choice given the relatively high capacity of the Beretta and the Glock. It is a bit more problematic with the low-cap 1911 though. Some shooters shoved the mag in a pocket, where digging it out could be time consuming. Others just carried the mag in their weak hand and shot one handed until they had to reload. One suggestion was to trap the base of the mag between the middle and ring fingers or ring and pinky fingers of the support hand, similar to the Graham flashlight method.

    This is actually a broader problem than the (admittedly unlikely) event you'll have to shoot somebody else's gun. Many of us rely on our firearms for home defense, but most of us don't wear a gunbelt with ammo pouches to bed. What do we do with our spare mags if we have to respond to an intruder in the middle of the night? In a way, this is an even worse problem than the scenario as because at night you'd be expected to manage a flashlight as well. This is one of the reasons I like the idea of a rifle for home defense. Pick it up and you've got 30 rounds right there.

    When I shot this scenario, one of the other guys decided to mess with me a bit (turnabout is fair play, after all). Rather than giving me a full gun and an extra mag, he only put three rounds in the Beretta and 9 in the spare mag. At the start signal, I grabbed the gun, got the safety off, and engaged the first target. I hit slide lock almost immediately, jammed the other mag in, and neutralized two more targets. I ran dry a second time just as I put the final round into the last target. I'd neutralized all three targets, but at the end of a scenario we expect the shooter to check behind them and get all the spectators to show their hands. Since it's kind of hard to get a potential threat to put his hands up with an empty gun, I set down the pistol and drew my knife (in a real fight I would have just dropped the pistol rather than set it down, but I don't think the Beretta owner would have appreciated that). Another option would have been to hit the slide release so that nobody could tell the gun was unloaded and bluff, but I didn't think of that at the time.

    Revolver Rampage
    The second scenario was intended to give people a chance to use a revolver for defensive shooting (all of our regulars are semi-auto guys). In this scenario, you are traveling to a state where your CWP is not honored. While there, you and your family are visiting a mall with a friend when shooting erupts. Before rushing off to find the rest of his family, he hands you his back-up revolver and a couple of speedloaders (what a pal!). You start out behind a table representing the cashier's stand in the store. There are a pair of barricades about 5 yards away representing the entrance to the store (this particular store doesn't have a rear exit). Several targets are scattered inside and outside the store, some of which have threat indicators on them. Pick the revolver up off the table and solve the problem. We used the S&W 686 as the revolver for this scenario (a bit of a stretch for a back-up gun, but it was what we had available).

    Since I was running the other scenario, I didn't get to see many shooters run this one. I did get a chance to shoot it though, and it was pretty fun. The 686 was very easy to shoot and extremely accurate (though I have to say the beautiful headshot I pulled off was probably sheer luck). As I mentioned earlier, I didn't have any of the problems with the double-action revolver as I did with the DA autopistols. Reloading was a bit of a challenge. In the excitement I hit the ejector rod a little too hard and ended up with a sall cut on my hand, but I still managed to get the thing reloaded twice. I spent the first cylinder neutralizing the two visible threats and reloaded behind concealment. In a real scenario, it probably would have been better to remain behind the table and wait, but since the target stands weren't going to come to me I got up and advanced, putting a few more rounds into the targets I'd already shot and neutralizing another one behind a barricade. I ran the gun dry doing this, so I did one more reload before turning around to do my sul scan. I think I did pretty well, considering this is only the third time I'd ever shot a revolver, but my reloads definitely needed some work. Besides the ejector rod problem and general fumbling, I shoved the speedloaders in the wrong pocket for the reload technique I was trying to use, so I had to swap the gun back to my primary had to get them out.

    I did get a chance to see Harold Green shoot this scenario. Harold used to be a hardcore wheelgun guy (it was his 686 we were using) but he hasn't shot revolvers in a while and it showed. When he ran the gun dry, he reached back and grabbed a 1911 magazine and just about tried to shove it into the revolver's grip before he realized what he was doing. I mention this not to tease him (well, maybe a little bit) but to point out the importance of training. Harold Green has been training and practicing with semi-autos for years and those skills are now his default. If you think "I'll do it this way for training, but in a real gunfight I'll do it differently" you're probably going to be disappointed (and quite possibly dead). In a stressful situation (even just a training scenario like this) you're much more likely to do things the way you've trained than the way you think you should do them intellectually. Train the way you want to fight because you will fight the way you've trained.

    At the same time as these events, we also ran a new shooter class for about half a dozen folks who didn't have any defensive shooting experience. I would have liked to help with this (I really enjoy teaching newbies) but unfortunately I was busy running the rest of the event. The new shooter class seemed to go pretty well. Two of the people in it were willing to go through the mall scenario (using the gun they'd practiced with, rather than the revolver). We let them take it nice and slow, with no pressure, and they did pretty good considering their level of experience. We run these classes periodically and if I can lapse into a blatant bit of self promotion: if you're in the Salt Lake area and are new to self-defense shooting and are interested in learning, or know someone who is, let us know. We'd be happy to put together a new shooter class during one of our events (no extra charge beyond the $12 match fee).

    Overall, I think this month's event went really well. Everyone seemed to have a lot of fun firing other people's handguns and I think both the familiarization shoot and the scenarios were quite instructive. It seems that handgun shooting skills are very transferable, not just from one pistol to another, but from semi-autos to revolvers. On the other hand, gunhanding skills, particularly safety manipulation for semi-autos and reloading for revolvers, are definitely not transferable. Familiarity with a broad range of guns is a plus, but when the time comes to defend your life there's no substitute for a weapon that you've practiced and are intimately familiar with.

    Monday, February 25, 2008

    March Event

    There's a Utah Polite Society event at Hendricksen Range Saturday, March 1.

    We plan to have three courses of fire. Each of these will be focused on using an unfamiliar sidearm for your personal defense. Prior to the exercises, we will demonstrate how to manipulate and fire each of several different handguns.

    We will have a few different handguns available for use, but ask that you let others shoot your personal sidearm in order to help us provide a little more variety in the types of firearms available. We would particularly encourage folks to bring any snub-nosed revolvers they may be willing to allow others to shoot. Although we would appreciate anyone willing to share his/her firearm(s) for these exercises, no one will be required to.

    The first pistol exercise will be a skills drill that will allow you to load, fire, and clear several different firearms in order to gain a degree of familiarity with them.

    The second exercise will be a simulated encounter that takes place in a gun free zone in a government building. At the start of the scenario, a nearby armed-guard has been shot and disabled. You retrieve his sidearm and use it for your personal defense.

    The third exercise will be a simulated encounter that takes place at a shopping mall in another state that doesn't recognize Utah concealed carry permits. Because of this you are unarmed, but are accompanied by a friend who has a valid permit in that state and is armed. At the start of the scenario, he hands you his backup revolver and you use it for your personal defense.

    Weather permitting, we will start a series of defensive carbine exercises in April. These will not be limited solely to "black rifles" but will allow the use of any rifle you have on hand that can realistically be employed as a defensive tool. In these exercises, we would very much like to address the specific defensive circumstances you may be interested in. In order to help identify these, we would like to have an informal discussion with those of you who would like to participate about the kind of exercises you'd like us to develop. If you're interested in this, please come prepared to discuss this with us.

    Over the weekend of May 2 through 4, the Utah Polite Society is hosting three-day pistol class presented by Gunsite Academy. Gunsite plans to cover the material usually covered in their 250 Pistol class plus special topics the students may request. This will be an accelerated class. The cost for the class is $550 with an additional $25 range fee payable to the Utah Polite Society to cover our range and material expenses. Gunsite is handling registration through their business office and has this class posted on the training calendar at their web site. For more information concerning this, contact Joe Borgione at 801-673-1029.

    Please bring your handgun (and related equipment) at least 100 rounds of pistol ammo (bring extra, if you would like to shoot additional handgun exercises or shoot steel after the exercises).

    Set up starts at 8:00 a.m.

    New shooter orientation starts at 8:30 a.m.

    Registration starts at 8:45 a.m.

    Shooting exercises start at 9:00 a.m.

    Event fee is $12.00.

    Wednesday, February 20, 2008

    Article on Permits in PA

    LINK

    Hold on tight to those permits.

    An unusual move, firearm permit revoked


    By Keith Gushard

    A Guys Mills man has lost his permit to carry a concealed firearm under a stipulation in state law that hasn’t been invoked in Crawford County for the last 16 years, if ever.

    Former Crawford Central School District tea-cher and U.S. Marine Corps veteran Gary Young says he will appeal Sheriff Walter (Nick) Hoke’s decision to revoke his permit.

    Last week, Young received a certified letter from the Crawford County Sheriff’s Office stating his license to carry a concealed firearm had been revoked and he had five days to turn in his permit.

    “The Sheriff of Crawford County, Pennsylvania, has determined that your character and reputation is such that you would be likely to act in a manner dangerous to the public,” the letter from Sheriff Hoke read.

    Young still is allowed to own guns, but can’t carry a concealed weapon without the permit.

    “Nobody has told me why,” Young said after he gave up the concealed firearm permit Tuesday at the sheriff’s office at the courthouse. “Nothing has been said. I want to know who my accusers are.”

    Sheriff Hoke said, “I’m not able to discuss the matter.”

    Young said he’s had the permit for seven years and he has never been arrested nor has he been charged with any crime.

    Young said the revocation may stem from trying to help his son in a custody case involving Young’s grandson. That case has been going on since at least 2006.

    Since taking office in January, Hoke hasn’t revoked any permits.

    Bob Stevens, who served as Crawford County’s sheriff for 16 years before Hoke, said he never invoked the clause cited by Hoke about persons being a danger to the public.

    In his 16 years as sheriff he had revoked about a dozen permits due to misconduct by a person, Stevens said.

    Stevens said he remembers revoking the permit of a man who was arrested for drunken driving who had two loaded guns in his vehicle.

    Stevens said he also revoked the permit of a man who had a complaint with a store over the purchase of an appliance. The man had a gun in his waistband and pulled his coat back to show the clerk the weapon.

    Young said he’s never used the gun to intimidate persons.

    “I’ve followed all the rules,” he said.

    Young does have the right to appeal the revocation to Craw-ford County Court of Common Pleas and plans an appeal.






    Saturday, February 16, 2008

    Easy Targets



    In light of recent events, I want to remind teachers and faculty that you are welcome to attend our events for free.




    2008


    Notre Dame Elementary

    Portsmouth, Ohio,

    February 7, 2008

    Louisiana Technical College

    Baton Rouge, Louisiana,
    February 8, 2008

    Mitchell High School

    Memphis, Tennessee,

    February 11, 2008

    E.O. Green Junior High School

    Oxnard, California,

    February 12, 2008

    Northern Illinois University s

    DeKalb, Illinois,

    February 14, 2008



    2007

    Virginia Tech
    Blacksburg, Virginia,
    April 16, 2007

    Delaware State University

    Dover, Delaware,

    September 21, 2007

    SuccessTech Academy

    Cleveland, Ohio,

    October 10, 2007


    More Here



    And let's not forget Belsan, Russia.
    September 1, 2004 three days
    one hundred thirty-four (334) people killed, including 186 children





    Monday, February 11, 2008

    More Previews of Coming Events

    Gunsite Class

    OK as you saw in a previous post, we’re hosting a three-day pistol class presented by Gunsite Academy at Hendricksen Range over May 2, 3, and 4.

    The class will cover the curriculum outlined in Gunsite’s 250-pistol course description on their web site. The 250 class normally takes five days, but a fair amount of this is spent conducting enough repetitions of each technique to better engrain them into muscle memory. The three-day class we’re hosting will cover the same material, but won’t have as many repetitions of each technique. However, we plan to run drills in our monthly shoots that will give you a chance to exercise the techniques learned in the class.

    Gunsite’s handling class registration through their business office, just as they do for the classes they teach at their home facility in Arizona. If you’ve not taken a class at Gunsite in the past two years, you’ll need to complete Gunsite’s vetting process in order to demonstrate you’re of good character. If you have a concealed weapon permit, sending them a Xerox copy of your permit and drivers license will suffice. This, and the application form can be FAXed or mailed with your payment for the class.

    Typically, Gunsite requires a 50% deposit at the time of registration and payment of the balance at the start of the class. As they won’t have facilities to handle payment at Hendricksen Range, they are requiring payment in full when you register for the class. Additionally, the Utah Polite Society will charge a $25 range fee on the first day of class to cover our range rental expenses. The registration fee for the class is $550.

    Here’s the direct link to Gunsite’s downloadable registration form:

    http://www.gunsite.com/assets/Media/application.pdf

    Defensive Carbine Series

    As soon as the weather warms up a bit and the snow melts (hopefully ‘round-about April) we plan to start running a series of defensive carbine exercises. We did this a couple of years ago and have had several requests to do it again.

    Last time John was kind enough to run the exercises for us, this year Robert will be running them. For those of you who may not know Robert, he’s of a very practical bent. If you’ve ever wondered how to apply a particular technique in a specific situation, Robert’s probably tried it. Not only has he probably tried it, he’s probably tried several variations of it, figured out which one works the best, and then practiced it until he’s proficient with it.

    Here’s the general progression we have planned.

    Prior to beginning the exercises, we’d like to start a dialogue with those of you who’d like to attend. We’d like to discuss this with you both at our next scheduled shoot in March and by responding to the replies you post to this Blog article. We’d like to find out the kinds of defensive situations you’re most interested in practicing with your defensive carbine. A few examples could be things like defending your home, defending a remote campsite or cabin, use of a carbine during civil unrest or natural disaster, or any other circumstance you would like to learn how to deploy your carbine in. So, please post your thoughts and suggestions here.

    Next, Robert plans to start with the basics – shooting positions/techniques, manual of arms for various and sundry carbines/rifles, etc… Speaking of various and sundry carbines and rifles, we don’t want to limit this just to “black” rifles. If you don’t have a black rifle, but have a lever-action rifle, bolt-action rifle, a .22 autoloader, or just about any other kind of rifle gathering dust in the back of your closet, bring it and learn how to make it work to your best advantage as a defensive tool. Individuals of any skill level with just about any kind of rifle are welcome to attend.

    Once we have basic shooting techniques down, we’ll move on to how best to employ your carbine in the defensive circumstances you’ve told us are of interest to you. We’ll start by setting up simulations on the range at Hendricksen - along the same lines we’ve been using for setting up simulations that employ handguns.

    As part of this series, we plan to study the use of carbines in conjunction with hand-held and/or weapon-mounted lights in low-light environments. We’ll demonstrate the techniques involved and then run a couple of simulations as part of the night shoot we plan to put together later this summer. Stay tuned to this Blog for more info on the night shoot.

    We also plan to employ carbines and rifles at longer ranges than are available at Hendricksen Range. Later in the summer, we plan to spend a day in Skull Valley doing longer-range exercises and penetration tests on things typically used as soft and hard cover. These will include things like car doors, windshields, sheetrock walls, cinderblock walls, and anything else we identify that’s of interest and practical to test.

    There’s a small canyon adjacent to the area in Skull Valley we plan to use for our carbine exercises. This canyon provides a small area with 360-degree backstops we plan to use for 360-degree handgun and, possibly, carbine exercises.

    So, that’s what we have in mind so far. To help us better develop this along the lines you’d like, please post your suggestions as replies to this article.

    Sunday, February 10, 2008

    Gunsite Training right here in SLC!






    One of our shooters, Joe has made arrangements for us to host an
    accelerated version of Gunsite's 250 Pistol class at Hendricksen Range
    over May 2, 3, and 4 of this year.


    Gunsite will provide two instructors, and adjust the pacing of the class
    to fit the competency level of those who participate. Their instructors
    will also have the latitude to address special topics we may request.

    The class will include a low-light session on the evening of May 3.

    Gunsite's business office with handle vetting, and registration for the
    class. The registration cost is $550, with an additional $25 fee to the
    Utah Polite Society to cover our range rental costs. Attendance will be
    capped at 20 participants.

    This is a very good chance to receive world-class training from Gunsite at
    a very reasonable price. The five-day 250 Pistol class held at Gunsite
    costs $1386 and the three-day 150 Pistol class held at Gunsite costs $905.
    If you were to take either of these classes at Gunsite, you would have
    additional expenses for travel and lodging that you won't have when taking
    a class locally.

    Wednesday, February 6, 2008

    October, November, January, and February Events

    I've been busy of late, and that's made me rather laggard about posting write-ups for our last few Polite Society events. After some encouragement from Harold Green and others (read: a swift kick in the butt) I've decided to go ahead and summarize the October, November, January, and February events. Unfortunately, I missed the events in September (backpacking) and December (snowed in), so I can't say much about those.

    October
    For our October event, we decided to try something a little different. Inspired by the book "Terror at Beslan" by John Giduck, and some discussions on DefensiveCarry.com about which guns everyone should be familiar with, I put together a scenario involving a school takeover by terrorists. While unlikely, this is certainly one of the most challenging self-defense scenarios imaginable. The most realistic objective probably isn't getting out alive (at Beslan, the two armed policemen who were among the intended hostages died in minutes) but doing as much as possible to disrupt the terrorist's plans before dying. In a situation like this, even those of us who carry multiple magazines are likely to run out of ammo before running out of targets (assuming we survive long enough to run out of either, of course). It may be necessary to pick up any available weapon and make use of it. This month's exercises was intended to familiarize the participants with two of the most common military style rifles weapons in the world and give them a chance to use them in a tactical scenario.

    Black Rifle Familiarization
    The AK-47 and AR-15 are the progenitors of the vast majority of military rifles used in the world today. In addition to military use around the globe, both rifles are widely used for domestic law enforcement and home defense. Familiarity with these two weapons represents a basic sort of "firearms literacy" that I think every shooter should possess. Before starting the drill we demonstrated the basic operating procedures for each (inserting and removing magazines, chambering a round, taking off the safety, and clearing the weapon). Each shooter had a chance to put ten rounds through each rifle. In addition to the AR and AK, we also had a SKS and a Hi-Point carbine available, to provide a bit of variety.

    After the demonstration, most folks were able to operate the AK and AR quite easily. The stripper clips used to load the SKS were difficult for a lot of folks. It seems like it would be much easier to reload a rifle with a detachable box magazine, especially under pressure. The Hi-Point carbine seemed to jam up for every other shooter. I would certainly not recommend it as a weapon for home defense.

    Beslan Redux
    The rifle pickup scenario was based on a terrorist takeover of a school. To encourage people to pick up and use the rifle, participants were limited to one pistol magazine which was downloaded to less than its full capacity. You started out behind cover, had to cross an open area between two barricades, pick up the rifle, (either an AK or an AR) and engage 4-6 targets downrange. Before the scenario, the rifle was placed in an unknown condition: it might or might not have a round in the chamber and the safety might or might not be on. You had to assess the condition of the rifle and get it into a shootable state. In addition, the magazine in the rifle only had a few rounds in it with a full mag lying nearby, to force the shooter to exchange magazines during the fight. Your task was to engage targets beyond the barricades and advance down an imaginary hallway extending downrange (presumably towards a son or daughter in some classroom).

    The most common problem in this scenario was running out of ammo. With a downloaded pistol mag and a rifle with only a few rounds it in, it shouldn't really be a surprise that a lot of people ran one or both guns dry. Nevertheless, the empty gun often seemed to come as a surprise and, in keeping with Murphy's Law, often happened at the most inopportune moment.

    Getting the rifle running took some time for some folks, but everyone was able to get the safety off and a round in the chamber. Accuracy with the rifle was generally quite good. Even people without any rifle shooting experience were able to make accurate shots at the 3-7 yard ranges involved. Once the time came for people to reload the rifle, however, the fumbling really began. Getting the empty mag out wasn't too hard. The first problem cropped up when people tried to remember which pocket they'd stuck the extra mag in. Once they had the new magazine in hand, fitting it into the rifle was often a challenge. Of course, the fact that a cold drizzle had started up by this point didn't help much.

    As usual, since I was running the stage, I had a chance to watch a lot of people shoot it before I did. Since you start out behind cover, the first thing I did was drop the mag on my pistol to see how many rounds I had available. It was completely empty. The only ammo I had was the round in the chamber. Rather than expending that I went straight for the rifle, (in my case, an AR-15) got it running and shot the first mag. Figuring I'd be just as fumble-fingered reloading as the rest, I did my reloading from behind cover and advanced to take out the other targets and ran the other magazine dry as well! A one shot pistol is better than nothing so I transitioned to my handgun. Thankfully I'd spent my last rifle rounds engaging the final target, so I completed the scenario without firing my pistol at all.

    Rifles are definitely much easier to shoot accurately at these ranges than pistols. Shots that would have been quite challenging with a handgun were downright easy with the rifle. That doesn't mean you don't need to practice with a rifle though. As our fumble-fingered reloads and other manipulation made clear, rifles require just as much training and practice in gunhandling techniques as a pistol. Everyone who shot the scenario was seriously lacking in this area. If you're planning to use a rifle for self defense, you need to train with it.

    Drawstroke Two-Step and Bad Breath Distance
    In addition to the rifle drill and scenario, I also included a pistol drill and scenario focusing on shooting from retention. The drill was a fairly simple one we've done before: Stand at arm's length from the target, draw, and fire from retention. Take a step back, draw, and fire from half extension. Take another step back and fire from three-quarters extension. Take another step back and fire from full extension. The scenario built on this by starting you out at "bad breath distance", less than arms length from the target. You then had to draw and neutralize the point blank target and one or two others. Since I was running the rifle stages, I didn't get a chance to shoot these or see anyone else shoot them. Everyone who did shoot them seemed to enjoy them though.

    November
    One of the things we emphasize at Polite Society shoots is the need to look behind you. Shooting on square or 180 degree range encourages the bad habit of assuming that everything you need to see in a fight is right there in front of you. In real life, while you're shooting an assailant, his buddy might be sneaking up behind you to whack you over the head with a tire iron. If you don't turn around and look, your first indication of this may be a sharp pain in the back of your skull. One of the questions in our after action review is, "Did you scan for additional threats?" Not only do we require people to look behind them, we also want to make sure they see what's going on behind them, rather than just taking a perfunctory glance over their shoulder. When a shooter checks behind them, they may see a spectator or RO holding a knife or redgun in their hand. The shooter is expected to call this out, as well as get everyone to get their hands out of their pockets so they're visible. As the saying goes, "In God we trust. Everyone else keep your hands where I can see them."

    The preferred way to check behind you is using position sul: with the gun held at chest height, grip parallel with the chest, pointed about a foot in front of your toes. This allows you to turn your body a full 360 degrees without muzzle sweeping any of the spectators standing behind you. A sul scan generally allows a much longer and more complete scan than trying to crane your neck around 180 degrees while keeping the gun pointed downrange. While we tend to do a lot of sul scans at Polite Society events, we seldom practice fighting from this position. This month's scenarios were designed to correct this deficiency.

    Defending Sul
    At longer ranges, shooting from sul is a matter of extending the gun and rotating both hands until you reach the normal full extension firing position. This takes only a little longer than bringing the gun up from low ready, though it is a bit more involved. At close range the pistol is held close to the body and fired from something more like a retention position. This can even be done when someone is going hand to hand with you and trying to block or grab the gun.

    Our first drill gave everyone the chance to practice shooting from sul. The basic drill is adapted from one in Gabe Suarez's classes. For the first string, you started in sul, several yards from the target, extended the gun, and fired. The next five strings were all shot at close range, from within a foot of the target. One string facing the target, one string with the target to the right, one with the target to the left, and two with the target behind (one turning to shoot the target, the other remaining facing away and bringing the gun around behind to shoot).

    Sul Surprise
    This month's scenario was a little different from our usual fare. Rather than starting off with the gun in the holster and a full magazine, you begin in position sul with your magazine downloaded by an unknown number of rounds. This is intended to simulate them just having apparently finished a gunfight and about to begin your sul scan. When the scenario begins, you turn around to find one target close behind them with a few others further out. You have to decide which, if any, of these targets are threats and deal with them accordingly.

    Most folks did fairly well with this one. When shooting the target immediately behind them some shooters extended the gun quite a ways, putting themselves at risk of a disarm. Many shooters also ran out of ammo unexpectedly, on account of the downloaded magazine. Most dealt with it fairly well, but there is a tendency, particularly among novice shooters, for other elements like cover and movement to fall by the wayside when reloading. This is even more evident when the empty gun arises unexpectedly.

    Sul Surprise Force-On-Force

    Ever since taking the force-on-force class with Gabe Suarez last summer, I've wanted to run a scenario both with live weapons, then with airsoft, to get a feel for the differences that arise with a live, resisting opponent. We did a little of this last June, but I spent most of that event helping out with the new shooter class so I didn't get a chance to do the airsoft part of the scenario.

    I thought the sul scenario would be a good candidate for airsoft. I also knew this month would probably be our last chance to shoot airsoft for a while, since the guns tend to get finicky and unreliable in cold weather. So we all packed up our real guns, broke out the plastic pellet shooters and searched each other for weapons.

    The airsoft scenario was set up exactly like the live fire one, with the shooter and four live "targets". Generally 2-3 of the targets were armed assailants, while the other 1-2 represented innocent bystanders. The biggest difference between the live fire scenario and the airsoft was speed. Most shooters took 15-20 seconds to complete the live fire scenario; the airsoft was generally over in about five seconds. When you're faced with targets that are moving and shooting back, things aren't nearly as leisurely as they are with cardboard. I think it was an eye-opening experience, particularly for folks who hadn't done any airsoft force-on-force training before.

    On the downside, having three opponents, particularly when you start out in such a disadvantageous position, could be on the overwhelming side. Now, facing overwhelming odds in a self-defense situation is certainly a possibility, and one we should train for. However, I think some of the subtler lessons that this drill could have offered may have gotten lost in the 3 on 1 fight. If we do this in the future, I'd probably use fewer assailants, perhaps even just one to start with.

    December
    As I mentioned earlier, I missed the December shoot because I was snowed in. This was a real bummer, since I wanted to see how the drills and scenarios I had planned would work out. This month's theme was "hearts and minds", or making the transition between torso shots and head shots. We used balloons in the target's torso and head to provide a reactive element. One of the balloons was connected to a piece of cardboard by a string and the target wasn't neutralized until the cardboard dropped. If popping the torso balloon didn't do it, the shooter had to transition to head shots. Since I didn't get to see it, I can't really give a report on it, but those who were there said it went really well.

    January
    One of the reasons to carry a firearm is to help avoid being injured in a confrontation with a violent criminal. Unfortunately, bad things sometimes happen and some injuries are unavoidable. However, an injury, even a serious one, is not the end world, or even the end of the confrontation. Continuing to resist an assailant even after being injured may mean the difference between life and death. This month's exercises concentrated on shooting and gunhandling without using the support hand or arm.

    For all of these drills we simulated an injured hand or arm using a sling and an oven mitt. However, even with the sling and mitt, people still tried to use their support hand when shooting and to manipulate the pistol. I think this was completely unintentional. The two handed shooting and gunhandling procedures were just so deeply ingrained that they did them without thinking. After trying several permutations, what we found worked best was to put the sling on backwards, so that the sewn up end, which would usually hold the elbow, covered the hand. This restricts the use of the hand enough that most people got the message and stopped trying to use it to shoot.

    Dominant Hand Reload
    The first drill involved reloading a pistol using only the primary hand. The basic procedure is pretty simple, though there are many possible permutations: Eject the magazine. Stick the gun someplace, either back in the holster, between the knees, clamp it under a knee, etc. Shove a new magazine in. If the slide is locked back, release it.

    Dominant Hand Malfunction
    Clearing a malfunction is a bit more difficult, since it requires manipulating the slide one-handed. This is much easier if the front edge of your rear sight has a sharp angle, rather than the smoothly sloping ramp seen on some sights. Simply hook the rear sight on a hard edge, like a kydex holster, stiff gun belt, boot, or any other handy object, and shove the pistol forward. Be careful not to muzzle sweep yourself when doing this! If your gun has a smooth, sloping rear ramp, operating the slide one-handed is more difficult. If you're left handed, you can sometimes operate it by catching the ejection port instead of the rear sight. Otherwise, you can try clamping the slide in the crook of your knee, or simply rubbing the top of the slide along your leg to get enough friction to operate it (sticking some skateboard tape atop the slide can help with this).

    Once you've figured out how to operate the slide, clearing a Type 1 or 2 malfunction (tap, rack bang) is easy. Tap by thumping the base of the magazine against your leg and rack using one of the techniques described above.

    Mostly Armless

    The first scenario simulated a robbery at an ATM. You are standing at the ATM waiting for their money when an assailant initiates a robbery by stabbing you in the arm. You have to turn around and deal with the robber and three additional targets (who may be accomplices or innocent bystanders).

    This scenario went smoothly for most folks until they had to reload. When they did, things immediately slowed to a crawl as they tried to stash the gun and get to their magazines. Obviously, this gave an advantage to folks with high capacity magazines who could deal with three or four assailants before their gun ran dry and thus were able to reload without worrying too much about unneutralized targets. Some folks with lower capacity guns tried to compensate by husbanding their rounds and shooting fewer at each target, but this often resulted in failing to neutralize some of the targets.

    I shot pretty well with one hand on this exercise. A little too well , in fact. I just finished off the last armed target with a beautiful headshot when I saw the cardboard sheriff's star hanging on its chest. We include police targets in our scenarios to remind folks that not every armed person is necessarily a threat. Unfortunately, it can be hard to make the distinction when your heart is racing and the smell of gunpowder is in the air. If you shoot with us long enough, sooner or later everyone ends up shooting the sheriff.

    One Armed vs. Bandit

    For the second scenario, rather than leading off with a disabling injury, it was assumed that you had injured your arm on some earlier occasion. Since you knew in advance they would have to be fighting one-handed you were allowed to transfer magazines to the strong side and make any other adaptations for one-handed fighting.

    This scenario simulated a robbery at a convenience store. A target representing the clerk stands behind a table with a line of customers and/or robbers ahead of you. Unfortunately, this scenario didn't work out quite as well as I would like. There was a tendency for things to get caught up in decision whether to intervene, rather than practicing one-handed shooting. It's a valid question whether or not you're willing to risk life, limb, imprisonment, and/or financial ruin for the clerk at the Stop N' Rob and definitely something people need to think about in advance, rather than in the middle of a robbery. However, it wasn't really what I'd intended when I wrote this particular scenario. In addition, it's a question that can turn on the actions and behavior of the robber, which is difficult to simulate with paper targets (it would probably work much better in force-on-force). Other than that, the scenario went relatively well. Being prepared ahead of time made reloading a bit easier.

    February
    This month's event was really a continuation of last month's. Instead of shooting with only the primary hand, we shot only with the support hand. This introduces two additional complications: people generally don't practice shooting with their support hand nearly as much, and drawing the gun and getting it into action gets really difficult. Just like last month, we used a backwards sling to take one arm out of action.

    The weather was cold and clear this month, without any precipitation. However, there was more snow on the ground than I've seen up at the range before. It was well over knee high, except for the sidewalks, which had been shoveled. This restricted our mobility quite a bit.

    Support Hand Draw

    Before starting the event, we gave everyone a REALLY strong safety warning. Pretty much every way of drawing with the support hand involves a substantial risk of muzzle sweeping either yourself or someone else. Furthermore, they usually involve handing the gun in something other than the usual master grip, increasing the chance that a stray finger will find its way into the trigger, so muzzle control is critical. Everyone was advised to GO SLOW, in both the drills and the scenarios. If you want to practice doing a support hand draw quickly, get a red gun or do it during dry fire, not with a loaded weapon. Finally, if anyone dropped a gun while trying one of these draws, they were not to try to grab the gun on the way down. You don't know which direction the muzzle will end up pointing when your hand catches up with it and it would be easy for a finger to find its way into the trigger guard. Even if it's a high end 1911 with an absolutely beautiful finish, let it hit the ground. This was probably the most extensive safety warning we've ever given before a Polite Society event (even more than the night shoot last summer).

    With the extensive safety warnings out of the way, we demonstrated several techniques for drawing the pistol with the support hand. There are a variety of ways to do this depending on how flexible and how big around the middle you are. Essentially you can either go behind the back or reach across your body in front. If you're flexible enough, behind the back is easiest since it puts your hand in the proper position relative to the gun. Simply reach behind the back and grab the grip of the gun, pull it out of the holster and bring it around to the left side (being careful not to sweep yourself or those behind you). It usually isn't possible to get a master grip on the gun initially, so after getting it over to the left side you have to fool around a bit to get your hand into position. When I was doing this during the first drill, I almost proved the point of my safety lecture in a somewhat spectacular fashion. While trying to get a master grip, my middle finger got into the trigger guard and actually came into contact with the trigger. I didn't end up having an ND, but I came very close. However, I was following my own advice and the gun was pointed in a safe direction at the time, so an ND would have been embarrassing rather than catastrophic. Since I'm willing to sacrifice a bit of my pride for safety I immediately pointed out what I'd almost done, in hopes of further impressing the need for care and muzzle control on everyone.

    The other family of support hand draws involves reaching across the body in front. Once you've got your hand on the gun, you'll need to get the gun oriented correctly (it will initially be upside down). One method of doing this is to turn the gun around 180 degrees in the holster, turning it into sort of a jackass cross-draw. As with all cross draw holsters, you need to take care not to sweep those behind you when drawing. Another technique is to pull the pistol out and clamp it between the knees while you get the proper grip on it. Finally, if you're kneeling down behind cover or have a convenient surface handy, just set the pistol down and pick it up in a proper master grip.

    Of course, none of these methods is exactly what anyone would call fast. The quickest way to get a gun into action with the support hand is to have one on your support side. Anyone who carries a back-up gun should consider carrying it where it will be accessible to their off hand. Even if you don't carry a second firearm, consider carrying a knife on the support side. Against a close range attacker it may buy you the time and distance you need to make the awkward support hand draw and get the gun into action. Finally, while not quite as easy to get to as a dedicated support side weapon, a firearm in the appendix position can be accessed much more easily with the support hand than one on the far hip.

    In the first drill everyone had a chance to try the different methods of drawing the gun in both dry and live fire. I found that going around the back worked best for me and used it in the subsequent scenarios. It would have been even easier if we were shooting this event in June rather than February. Shoving a heavy winter coat out of the way to get to the gun added to the difficulty.

    Support Hand Reload/Malfunction
    After getting some practice drawing, the next drill involved clearing a malfunction and reloading. This works pretty much the same way with the support hand as it does with the primary, so I'm not going to go through it again. The only major difference is that the holster generally isn't easily accessible as a place to put the pistol when you're shoving a magazine into it, so you have to get a bit more creative in finding someplace to stash it while manipulating the mag.

    Adding Insult to Injury
    Given my disappointment with the convenience store scenario last month, I decided to try something different. I also wanted to simulate a situation where the shooter knew in advance their arm would be out of action due to a preexisting injury. In real life, if my right arm were in a cast or otherwise out of action for any period of time, the first thing I'd do would be to get a left handed holster for my pistol. Having everyone bring opposite-side carry gear for a scenario is a bit much, so I wanted something where they wouldn't have to draw the gun.

    In this scenario, you're sitting at home watching TV (in a chair facing uprange) with your pistol on the side table next to you. An earlier injury has put your primary arm in a sling. A group of home invaders kicks in the door and you have to retrieve your pistol with the support hand and deal with the situation. A pair of barricades about fifteen feet downrange of the chair represent the front door. Five targets were placed inside or outside the house. Those with threat indicators are the home invaders while those without represent family members. The RO yells "bang, boom, crash" to indicate the door being broken in to start the scenario.

    Since they didn't have to draw the gun, this scenario went much more smoothly for folks than the other stages. This stage didn't offer much good cover and the knee deep snow restricted movement except on the shoveled walkway, so most shooters didn't do much of either, leaving them fairly exposed for most of the scenario. Slow reloads and the disadvantages of limited ammo capacity reared their heads again, as they did last month. Shooting, however, was generally quite accurate. Indeed, at least one person remarked that they were shooting more accurately left handed than they usually did with their right. While it seems counterintuitive, it actually happens to a lot of people, probably because they take things slower and pay more attention to the fundamentals when shooting with the support hand.

    One other interesting thing cropped up when Robin Hood was shooting the exercise. He got within about ten feet of a target placed "outside" the two barricades representing the front door and didn't see it. It might seem odd that he didn't notice a six foot tall target armed with a cardboard shotgun for a threat indicator, but that's what happened. John Farnam has observed that we tend to see doors and windows as barriers and look at them rather than viewing them as portals and looking through them. They will admit bullets, however, so we need to pay attention to what's on the other side.

    Robin did have his revenge, though. The first time he ran me through the scenario he yelled "bang boom crash" and I whirled around to see five targets. Two sported guns and sheriff's badges, the others only cellphones. I managed to avoid shooting any law enforcement officers this time, though reaching for my gun the way I did probably would have gotten me shot anyway (I certainly hope I'm never on the receiving end of a no-knock warrant).

    As usual when we give someone a no-shoot scenario, we give them another chance to run the stage with actual threats so they still get some trigger time. Robin went all out this time and gave me five threat targets. I blew through almost two full mags for my Glock. During one of the reloads, I set my gun on the ground upside down while I shoved the new mag in and when I brought it up the top of the slide was caked with snow. The sights weren't visible at all and the next shot was definitely point-shooting. That shot blew off most of the snow, but according to the folks who were watching (I was too busy to notice) my gun was steaming as I shot it for the rest of the scenario .

    Mostly Armless (Again)
    The second scenario was exactly the same as last month's. You're getting money from an ATM when a mugger decides to start things of by stabbing you. This month he stabs the other arm, of course.

    After all the safety warnings, everyone managed to draw safely, but nobody's draw was what you would describe as "quick" or "graceful". If they were really facing an aggressive knife wielding assailant, they would have been thoroughly ginsued before they got their gun into action.

    Normally when I'm running a stage, I wait until everyone else has gone or there's a break in the action before I shoot it myself (the cook eats last). This time, however, I decided to insert myself into the rotation after seeing the first few shooters. I carry a fairly big folding knife in my left side pocket and I was able to get it out and in action much more quickly than going for my gun. I didn't quite slice the cardboard target in half, but I sure ruined the t-shirt we had on it. After slicing up the closest knife-wielding assailant, I backed up and went for my pistol and used it to engage the other attackers. Along this same vein, Robin Hood drew his pistol from his left-side coat pocket for this scenario (he normally carries a revolver in that pocket in the winter).

    Aside from the draw, the biggest problem I noticed in this scenario was people tended to overextend the gun when dealing with the close range knife-wielding assailant. Had it been a real attacker, rather than a cardboard target, they would have run a real risk of being disarmed or getting their gun hand sliced up. While this pops up occasionally in other events with a close range target (including last month's Mostly Armless scenario) it tends to happen to inexperienced shooters. This month almost half the people practically handed the nearest target their gun, including some fairly experienced folks. I think part of the reason for this may be the draw. The drawstroke that we teach new shooters and encourage more experienced shooters to use puts the gun in the retention position and then extends it forward. If an assailant is at close range, it's natural to stop this extension and shoot him from the retention position. In contrast, the support hand draws people were using for this event don't naturally put the gun in the retention position, you have to purposely retract it if you want to shoot from retention. I think this led to a lot of people overextending toward that first target.

    In the end, despite (or perhaps because) of the dire safety warnings, everyone ended up going home with the same number of holes in them the had when they came. Beyond that, I think it was a challenging and successful shoot.

    Gunhandling
    If there is a common theme in these events (or at least three of the four) I'd have to say that it's gunhandling. I've always believed that gunhandling is as important as shooting in a self defense situation. The most accurate shooting in the world won't save you if you take too long getting your gun into action, or getting it back into action after a malfunction or reload.

    Folks who shoot with us regularly generally have good gunhandling skills, and most new shooters develop them after a few months. However, as some of these drills and scenarios demonstrated, giving a good gunhandler an unfamiliar weapon or taking away one of his hands is all it takes to reduce him to a bumbling amateur. I say this as someone who did my share of bumbling during these scenarios.

    If you intend to defend yourself with a pistol, developing good gunhandling skills could save your life. If you plan to defend yourself with a rifle or shotgun, it's important to master the gunhandling skills associated with that weapon. Pistol skills don't transfer! Finally, practice one-handed gunhandling as well as one-handed shooting.

    Wednesday, January 30, 2008

    February 2nd Polite Society Event

    There’s a Utah Polite Society event scheduled for Saturday, February 2 at Hendricksen Range

    This Saturday’s event is focused on operating your sidearm with only your support hand (left hand if you are right handed).

    We have four exercises planned for Saturday.

    We will start the event by demonstrating techniques for loading and putting your sidearm into battery using only your support hand. We will then give everyone the opportunity to practice these techniques dry, prior to starting the live fire exercises.

    Exercise one is a tactical test that will reinforce one-handed draw and fire techniques using live fire.

    Exercise two is a tactical test that exercises malfunction clearance using only the support hand.

    Exercise three is a simulated defensive encounter requiring you to address an encounter at an ATM using only your support hand.

    Exercise four is a simulated defensive encounter requiring you to address a home invasion using only your support hand.

    Please bring your handgun, a strong-side holster, a magazine pouch, extra magazine(s), and at least 100 rounds of ammo (bring extra, if you would like to shoot additional exercises or shoot steel after the scheduled exercises).

    Set up starts at 8:00 a.m.

    New shooter orientation starts at 8:30 a.m.

    Registration starts at 8:45 a.m.

    Shooting exercises start at 9:00 a.m.

    Event fee is $12.00

    Tuesday, January 29, 2008

    Front Sight offers $2k free training for AZ teachers.

    LINK


    LAS VEGAS, Jan. 28 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Front Sight Firearms Training Institute founder and director, Dr. Ignatius Piazza is known by his hundreds of thousands of students as the "Millionaire Patriot" because over the last 11 years Dr. Piazza has provided tens of millions of dollars in training and benefits free of charge to assist law-abiding citizens in securing what he refers to as the "Comfort of Skill at Arms."

    In response to Arizona Senate Bill 1214, which would exempt concealed-carry permit holders from a state law that bars individuals from knowingly carrying deadly weapons onto school property, Dr. Ignatius Piazza has committed to provide every Arizona School teacher with a $2,000, Four Day Defensive Handgun Course, free of charge if Arizona lawmakers will pass the Senate Bill 1214.

    If it becomes law, the measure would allow teachers to carry their weapon onto the grounds of any public or private K-12 school, college or university in the state. Dr. Piazza wants to put the Arizona public and legislators' minds at ease in passing the measure by training all school teachers free of charge to levels that exceed law enforcement standards.

    Ignatius Piazza states, "Every time sanity begins to prevail with good legislators like Arizona Senate Majority Leader Thayer Verschoor and Senator Karen Johnson introducing a real solution to protect our children from a violent attack, the unenlightened begin crying about their fear of teachers with guns. The same people who don't want teachers with guns are happy to have more cops on campus at tax payers' expense. Front Sight Firearms Training Institute will train teachers who secure a Concealed Carry Permit to levels that exceed law enforcement standards, giving Arizona Public Schools immediate and trained armed response to violent attack and save Arizona tax payers millions of dollars."

    But Rep. David Lujan, a Phoenix Democrat and president of the Phoenix Union High School District board, said he is "uncomfortable with having weapons on school campuses." In the context of a school shooting, for example, he said the prospect of additional weapons in the hands of faculty or even students could "exacerbate the situation" when police arrive on scene and are trying to quickly identify the assailant.

    Piazza responds, "Representative Lujan simply needs to take Front Sight's Four Day Defensive Handgun Course and he would walk away knowing he has the proper decision making ability in the judicious use of deadly force and the handgun skills to stop a deadly attacker immediately, safely and responsibly. He would then have the same confidence in any of his Arizona teachers who completed Front Sight's course." Piazza adds, "When police arrive on the scene it will be very easy for them to identify the assailant. He will be the only dead body because an armed teacher stopped a potential massacre as soon as it started."

    From the hundreds of testimonials from law enforcement officers who have attended Front Sight Firearms Training Institute near Las Vegas, claiming it is the best firearms training they have ever received, it appears Ignatius Piazza can deliver on his promise to train Arizona teachers to levels that exceed law enforcement standards. The fact that he will provide the firearms training free should make the Millionaire Patriot's offer very hard for teachers, schools districts or legislators to decline.

    Saturday, January 26, 2008

    Common Mis-Conceptions on Street Encounters

    Having shot with a lot of new CCW permit holders I've noticed that several re-occurring themes seem to alway arise at our monthly events. A while back I read an FBI study:"Violent Encounters: Felonious Assaults on America’s Law Enforcement Officers." It addresses many of these common mis-conceptions.

    I'll quote some of my favorite parts of the 5-year study of 43 street felons involved in violent encounters with police offices.

    First mis-conception:

    1.Those bad men on the street are dis-organized, unpracticed and generally ignorant to "formal handgun training." That 5 shot snubby revolver in my glove box and the CCW permit in my wallet/purse are magic talismans against thugs.

    Guess what, WRONG!

    NEW FINDINGS FROM FBI ABOUT COP ATTACKERS & THEIR WEAPONS

    New findings on how offenders train with, carry and deploy the weapons they use to attack their victims have emerged in a just-published, 5-year study by the FBI.

    Among other things, the data reveal that most would-be cop killers:

    --have more experience using deadly force in "street combat" than their intended victims;

    --practice with firearms more often and shoot more accurately;

    --have no hesitation whatsoever about pulling the trigger. "If you hesitate," one told the study's researchers, "you're dead. You have the instinct or you don't. If you don't, you're in trouble on the street...."

    FAMILIARITY.

    Several of the offenders began regularly to carry weapons when they were 9 to 12 years old, although the average age was 17 when they first started packing "most of the time." Gang members especially started young.

    Nearly 40% of the offenders had some type of formal firearms training, primarily from the military. More than 80% "regularly practiced with handguns, averaging 23 practice sessions a year," the study reports, usually in informal settings like trash dumps, rural woods, back yards and "street corners in known drug-trafficking areas."

    One spoke of being motivated to improve his gun skills by his belief that officers "go to the range two, three times a week [and] practice arms so they can hit anything."

    Ask yourself how many rounds you have put through your daily carry piece.

    The offender quoted above about his practice motivation, for example, fired 12 rounds at an officer, striking him 3 times. The officer fired 7 rounds, all misses.

    More than 40% of the offenders had been involved in actual shooting confrontations before they feloniously assaulted an officer. Ten of these "street combat veterans," all from "inner-city, drug-trafficking environments," had taken part in 5 or more "criminal firefight experiences" in their lifetime.

    One reported that he was 14 when he was first shot on the street, "about 18 before a cop shot me." Another said getting shot was a pivotal experience "because I made up my mind no one was gonna shoot me again."

    Again in contrast, only 8 of the 50 LEO victims had participated in a prior shooting; 1 had been involved in 2 previously, another in 3. Seven of the 8 had killed offenders.


    I don't know about you.... I don't have even 1 gunfight under my belt (and I hope I never do).

    2. "I don't carry my gun all the time. I'll take it with me if I'm somewhere dangerous." or "It's with me all the time, under the seat of my truck."

    3. "Thugs don't waist money on good gear and I can spot one carrying a gun from across the street."

    CONCEALMENT.

    The offenders said they most often hid guns on their person in the front waistband, with the groin area and the small of the back nearly tied for second place. Some occasionally gave their weapons to another person to carry, "most often a female companion." None regularly used a holster, and about 40% at least sometimes carried a backup weapon.

    In motor vehicles, they most often kept their firearm readily available on their person, or, less often, under the seat. In residences, most stashed their weapon under a pillow, on a nightstand, under the mattress--somewhere within immediate reach while in bed.

    Almost all carried when on the move and strong majorities did so when socializing, committing crimes or being at home. About one-third brought weapons with them to work. Interestingly, the offenders in this study more commonly admitted having guns under all these circumstances than did offenders interviewed in the researchers' earlier 2 surveys, conducted in the 1980s and '90s.

    According to Davis, "Male offenders said time and time again that female officers tend to search them more thoroughly than male officers. In prison, most of the offenders were more afraid to carry contraband or weapons when a female CO was on duty."

    On the street, however, both male and female officers too often regard female subjects "as less of a threat, assuming that they not going to have a gun," Davis said. In truth, the researchers concluded that more female offenders are armed today than 20 years ago--"not just female gang associates, but female offenders generally."
    These guys are carrying ALL THE TIME! and no ones has explained to them the rules that they must carry strong side in a good kydex holster. They learned to carry a gun about the same time they started riding a bicycle. They know how to use it like riding a bike. It's second nature.

    Getting a little nervous yet?

    4. "I've been shooting all my life. tins cans, bullseye targets, fence posts." Standing still, lining up the sights, deep breath, squeeze... Most of those great habits go out the window when someone is trying to kill you!


    SHOOTING STYLE.

    Twenty-six of the offenders [about 60%], including all of the street combat veterans, "claimed to be instinctive shooters, pointing and firing the weapon without consciously aligning the sights," the study says.

    "They practice getting the gun out and using it," Davis explained. "They shoot for effect." Or as one of the offenders put it: "[W]e're not working with no marksmanship....We just putting it in your direction, you know....It don't matter...as long as it's gonna hit you...if it's up at your head or your chest, down at your legs, whatever....Once I squeeze and you fall, then...if I want to execute you, then I could go from there."

    HIT RATE.

    More often than the officers they attacked, offenders delivered at least some rounds on target in their encounters. Nearly 70% of assailants were successful in that regard with handguns, compared to about 40% of the victim officers, the study found. (Efforts of offenders and officers to get on target were considered successful if any rounds struck, regardless of the number fired.)

    Davis speculated that the offenders might have had an advantage because in all but 3 cases they fired first, usually catching the officer by surprise. Indeed, the report points out, "10 of the total victim officers had been wounded [and thus impaired] before they returned gunfire at their attackers."

    Think about that one, No hesitation, 70% got hits on target, trained and practiced and they have the initiative. Sound like I need more range time and training.

    5. "I know exactly how I would handle an deadly encounter at the quickie mart." Are those mental images based on what you've seen on TV?

    "It appeared clear that none of these officers were willing to use deadly force against an offender if other options were available," the researchers concluded.

    The offenders were of a different mind-set entirely. In fact, Davis said the study team "did not realize how cold blooded the younger generation of offender is. They have been exposed to killing after killing, they fully expect to get killed and they don't hesitate to shoot anybody, including a police officer. They can go from riding down the street saying what a beautiful day it is to killing in the next instant."

    "Offenders typically displayed no moral or ethical restraints in using firearms," the report states. "In fact, the street combat veterans survived by developing a shoot-first mentality.


    You may never run into someone like these 43 felons interviewed. Then again, you might. Plan for the worst, hope for the best. Just wanted to remind everyone that the good guys doesn't win by default.

    RH




    Train oportunities

    We are working (with the help of others) to host some training opportunities. As early as May, we could see some interesting things happening.

    More to come.

    We are Wikified!

    UPS has been Wiki'd

    (toward the bottom)

    Calendar

    Utah's Personal Protection Laboratory